![]() |
SecuROM: Why they hate Process Explorer... |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | ||
Matts_User_Name
Senior Member
Joined: 10 August 2006 Location: USA Online Status: Offline Posts: 610 |
Quote Reply
Topic: SecuROM: Why they hate Process Explorer...Posted: 07 June 2007 at 1:45pm |
|
|
I wrote SecuROM the following email:
Here is their response:
That is just stupid, "trace the behavior of SecuROM" many apps can monitor data. Hmm any ideas you think I could write in response to perhaps have them change their mind? Edited by Matts_User_Name - 07 June 2007 at 1:52pm |
||
![]() |
||
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17287 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 June 2007 at 1:54pm |
|
|
Google securom.
First hit:
Can you think of any reason Sony won't play nice with Sysinternals' utilities?
|
||
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
||
![]() |
||
namrehto
Senior Member
Joined: 23 June 2005 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 3861 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 June 2007 at 2:00pm |
|
|
||
|
Gil
|
||
![]() |
||
Matts_User_Name
Senior Member
Joined: 10 August 2006 Location: USA Online Status: Offline Posts: 610 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 June 2007 at 2:25pm |
|
Initially that is what I thought. But I think they are talking about the open "Handles and Dlls" As for the dumping, they might think the process Stack and Memory read is considered dumping. I wrote them back asking how the driver is dangerous if the PE exe is not running. And if so I ask them if they could elaborate on what it does exactly when PE is completely shut down. Im curious to see what they have to say about that. Ill post it once they respond. ...... Yea gee I wonder why they dont like Mark R. perhaps because he found their rootkit. lol |
||
![]() |
||
EP_X0FF
Senior Member
Joined: 08 March 2006 Location: Russian Federation Online Status: Offline Posts: 4753 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 June 2007 at 6:17am |
|
|
Most funny in this situation is that such kind of "defense" by banning several tools in order to keep behavior of "defense" in a secret - just pain for usual users of these tools. Peoples who interested in SecuRom "behavior" will trace it though in the end.
|
||
|
Ring0 - the source of inspiration
|
||
![]() |
||
Wwhat
Newbie
Joined: 03 August 2006 Location: Belgium Online Status: Offline Posts: 12 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 August 2007 at 6:13pm |
|
|
Isn't it obvious? they don't want the tech press (and litigators) to be on their ass for including a sony rootkit with a game and have evidence for it.
|
||
![]() |
||
noks
Newbie
Joined: 17 August 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 4 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 August 2007 at 3:48am |
|
|
God, why is this even happening...
I think most of this has also started happening since the newly released game Bioshock came implemented with its SecuROM DRM features. I think I will hold off buying it now; I do not want any DRM crap on my computer. And limiting installs to 5 computers or whatever? Or even having the cheek to even think about limiting it to X computers? I'm sorry, but I bought the damn thing, and I can install it whereever I want, how many times I want. They're making people resort to piracy [by bypassing and removing it] to play their own damn game. That is, regardless of the fact they might only install it on one computer in their lifetime. I certainly dont want DRM limiting any number of installs or it even installed on my computer. And if will prevent me from running Process Explorer? All the more reason to turn to some program that gets rid of it. If I want it running, I want it running! Steam, the game distribution platform, allows you to buy Bioshock and tie it in to your account. It has its own DRM feature; you need to log in to play a game, or have the account info saved to your computer so you can play it offline. Trouble is...this also comes implemented with the DRM "version". Arrrggghhh!! Get rid of this useless, and franky annoying DRM stuff Sony. I want to meet the guy who programmed it...t**t! Edited by noks - 27 August 2007 at 4:04am |
||
![]() |
||
Fedhax
Newbie
Joined: 31 August 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 August 2007 at 5:37pm |
|
|
Piracy won't even let you bypass SecuROM on this particular issue. (Disclaimer: I am not promoting it or condoning it)
There is a recently released crack for Bioshock that has hit the torrent networks, and I ran across one user that has having this problem with the Bioshock crack. It wasn't until the user pasted this link that I knew that this problem could occur with PC games: http://www.securom.com/message.asp?m=module&c=5024 In some wicked kind of irony, the crack lets you bypass activation, SecuROM installation, and the use of a valid software key. However, it does not prevent you from dealing with this kind of issue. Protecting your software and IP is one thing, but doing so in such a zealous manner that it will refuse to run with system/admin software installed on your system is just plain wrong. |
||
![]() |
||
JolietJake
Newbie
Joined: 26 July 2007 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 10 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 September 2007 at 5:10pm |
|
|
SecuROM's corporate advertising blurb-'GET MORE CONTROL'.
Tells you all you need to know really. |
||
![]() |
||
Aztek
Newbie
Joined: 22 September 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 11 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 September 2007 at 5:55am |
|
|
Their answer to the closed process explorer
why not just add a simple way to rename the driver :D Edited by Aztek - 25 September 2007 at 5:56am |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |