![]() |
Procmon 2.1 Uses 100% CPU on 2K SP4 |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | ||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Procmon 2.1 Uses 100% CPU on 2K SP4Posted: 17 October 2008 at 9:50pm |
|
|
In Process Explorer System Properties Process Monitor has most CPU Usage about 85-90% followed by kmixer.sys with about 2-4%. In main Explorer window everything else has less thasn about 10% CPU Usage
|
||
![]() |
||
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17287 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 10:02pm |
|
|
||
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 10:40pm |
|
|
ntoskrnl.exe!KiDispatchInterrupt+0x7b
VIDEOPRT.SYS!VideoPortQueueDpc+0x1e ntoskrnl.exe!KeUpdateSystemTime+0x14c PROCMON20.SYS+0x1ff8 PROCMON20.SYS+0x20da ntoskrnl.exe!PsSetCreateThreadNotifyRoutine+0xa8 ntoskrnl.exe!KiDispatchInterrupt+0x422 I have now logged in using my administrative account and have the same problem. I believe this is what you asked for. I used the latest download symbols and not the MS server version if that makes any difference. |
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 10:45pm |
|
|
I have no idea if this is an issue but I have VMware Server v2.0 running although there are no VMs running.
|
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 11:00pm |
|
|
Don't know if it is an issue but there seems to be two instances of TID for PROCMON20.SYS one at +0x756 with no CPU or CSwitch Delta values and the active one with 90 to 95% CPU usage and 300 plus CSwitch Delta
|
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 11:03pm |
|
|
here is another stack list
ntoskrnl.exe!KiDispatchInterrupt+0x7b ntoskrnl.exe!KiReleaseSpinLock+0xae4 ntoskrnl.exe!ExFreePoolWithTag+0x16f PROCMON20.SYS+0x1ff8 PROCMON20.SYS+0x2001 PROCMON20.SYS+0x20da ntoskrnl.exe!PsSetCreateThreadNotifyRoutine+0xa8 ntoskrnl.exe!KiDispatchInterrupt+0x422 |
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 11:06pm |
|
|
Need to do other things right now. Thanks for your response. Will check back later.
|
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 11:24pm |
|
|
The message I mentioned earlier when I stopped Process Monitor capture was not accurate. I suppose you figured out the correct message but to be accurate the message is "Disconnecting from Event Tracking for Windows (ETW) This may take up to a minute.
off to other things. Thanks again |
||
![]() |
||
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17287 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 October 2008 at 3:01pm |
|
|
It certainly appears that Procmon's driver is busy doing something.
|
||
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 October 2008 at 3:56pm |
|
|
I let Procmon run with 100% usage for some time probably at least 30 minutes. What would letting it run longer prove? Is there a way to capture what caused it to resume normal activity?
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |