![]() |
9.40 Verify Code Signatures and Hide MS Entries |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | ||
xyz360400
Newbie
Joined: 06 August 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17 |
Quote Reply
Topic: 9.40 Verify Code Signatures and Hide MS EntriesPosted: 30 March 2009 at 9:23pm |
|
|
When Verify Code Signatures is checked along with Hide Microsoft and Windows entries, the Microsoft and Windows entries are not hidden. If only one is checked they function properly, only when used together does this occur.
I'm running the program in admin mode on Vista 64 SP1.
|
||
![]() |
||
midas
Newbie
Joined: 21 November 2005 Online Status: Offline Posts: 6 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 March 2009 at 10:37pm |
|
|
same thing here with windows 7 32 bit
|
||
![]() |
||
SvenBomwollen
Senior Member
Joined: 29 August 2008 Location: Germany Online Status: Offline Posts: 1142 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 March 2009 at 11:39pm |
|
|
Hi, folks.
Issue / design change (?) confirmed: When combining either of the these pairs, * Hide Windows Entries + Verify Code Signatures * Hide Microsoft and Windows Entries + Verify Code Signatures the selected Hide .. Entries option will be ignored, but Verify Code Signatures will be performed. Cheers, SvenBomwollen -- Windows Vista Home Premium, 32bit Autoruns v9.40 |
||
![]() |
||
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17492 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 March 2009 at 2:14am |
|
|
Also able to confirm behavior change, on XP SP3 and Vista Ultimate x86, with Autoruns 9.40...
|
||
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
||
![]() |
||
xyz360400
Newbie
Joined: 06 August 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 April 2009 at 6:58am |
|
|
Thanks for the confirmations guys. I guess I'll be keeping a copy of 9.39 around for a while, although 9.40 does show some new locations, this behaviour isn't what I want.
|
||
![]() |
||
laxeraend
Newbie
Joined: 03 April 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 April 2009 at 5:52am |
|
|
Why the euphemisms (design/behavior change)? This is a nasty regression bug making autoruns almost useless.
|
||
![]() |
||
SvenBomwollen
Senior Member
Joined: 29 August 2008 Location: Germany Online Status: Offline Posts: 1142 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 April 2009 at 4:01pm |
|
|
Hello, laxeraend.
My words
Yet, why greatly overstating the negative effect? Autoruns could be used for more than + verifying code signatures + of non-Windows and non-Microsoft executables. It still gives the most complete list of autoruns locations, doesn't it?! Would not call this "almost useless". Kind regards, SvenBomwollen |
||
![]() |
||
midas
Newbie
Joined: 21 November 2005 Online Status: Offline Posts: 6 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 April 2009 at 6:28pm |
|
|
well, it can be quite hard to look over 650+ items.
|
||
![]() |
||
SvenBomwollen
Senior Member
Joined: 29 August 2008 Location: Germany Online Status: Offline Posts: 1142 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 April 2009 at 11:39pm |
|
|
But verifying image files is not the only thing which Autoruns can do. SvenBomwollen Edited by SvenBomwollen - 03 April 2009 at 11:40pm |
||
![]() |
||
huggy
Newbie
Joined: 09 February 2006 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 22 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 April 2009 at 1:09pm |
|
|
Have to agree that this change is a retrograde step to me.; 9.39 stays.
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |