![]() |
PE,TaskMgr not running on Windows 2003;EventID 333 |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 56789 10> |
| Author | |
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17287 |
Quote Reply
Topic: PE,TaskMgr not running on Windows 2003;EventID 333Posted: 26 May 2009 at 12:00pm |
|
OK - so, to be sure, this statement is not actually the case?
|
|
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
|
![]() |
|
zizebra
Senior Member
Joined: 20 May 2009 Location: CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 142 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 May 2009 at 12:06pm |
|
My mistake there. All terminal servers are physical. This is the only server with 36Gb Memory and 16 Processors. The rest have either 8 or 4 Processors and 8Gb Ram
|
|
![]() |
|
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17287 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 May 2009 at 12:08pm |
|
Thanks for the clarification. If /basevideo has no impact, I'd (as mentioned) be curious as to the effect of limiting the amount of RAM. There seems to be plenty free, so I do not expect that doing so will have any impact on performance...
|
|
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
|
![]() |
|
zizebra
Senior Member
Joined: 20 May 2009 Location: CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 142 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 May 2009 at 12:13pm |
|
Well initially after going through all the recommendations you had passed, I had resolved to reduce the memory to 8gb. But I stopped because I was not sure. I will try it.
|
|
![]() |
|
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17287 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 May 2009 at 12:13pm |
|
...After the /basevideo experiment, correct? (Just to be sure - only want to be changing one thing at a time...)
|
|
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
|
![]() |
|
zizebra
Senior Member
Joined: 20 May 2009 Location: CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 142 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 May 2009 at 1:07pm |
|
Yeah you are right, one change at a time
|
|
![]() |
|
zizebra
Senior Member
Joined: 20 May 2009 Location: CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 142 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 June 2009 at 9:37am |
|
Hi all,
After more than 3weeks troubleshooting slow terminal servers the war seems to have been won. It would seem on the original problem server , the video card drivers were the culprit. They were using a high number of sysptes resulting in the shortage PTEs and the server would literally grind to a halt after some time. This is the second week and the server seems behaved now handling more connections than it was normally would. When the problem started the server only handled less than 10 connections before it came down to snails pace. Now its taking btwn 30 and 40 concurrent connections. The second server which also exhibited just about the same symptoms , slows down till it grinds to a halt. Taking less than 10 connections as well. But on this one there were no shortages on PTes or memory. The only unusual thing that I realised what was handle count for My-Sql- service file running on the system which seemed to be leaking handles somehow. I started monitoring it last week when Motolov said the fact that you have the problem does not mean its the same issue. Thanks motolov I can at least do something about the complex problems that I meet everyday. |
|
![]() |
|
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17287 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 June 2009 at 10:40am |
|
It's good to hear you were able to make such progress on the issues, Herbert!
![]() |
|
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
|
![]() |
|
zizebra
Senior Member
Joined: 20 May 2009 Location: CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 142 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 June 2009 at 11:46am |
|
I have been working well until yesterday. Apparently this time around the issue is slightly different but related to the original problem. Server hang. Apparently the server is working but now sometimes it drags since yesterday. I have checked out the pool allocations sysptes, overall memory usage which all seems with reasonable limits. Live debug shows that there has been 1 syspte allocation failure, 30 pool allocation failures which I suppose happened may be yesterday. At this point in time, everyone logged on is working fine but I cannot run perfmon either locally or remotely. Context switches -16 225 000 000.00 with cswitch delta - 35000 for system idle process.interrupts have 5 500 000 000.00 and cswitch delta of 2700, DPC has 1 500 000 000 and cswitch delta of 2100. What else can we look at. And Remember this 16 Proc Server,with 36gb Ram.
Edited by zizebra - 30 June 2009 at 11:50am |
|
![]() |
|
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17287 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 June 2009 at 11:51am |
|
If you're seeing pool allocation failures, again have a look at what poolmon says... And how close you are to hitting the pool limits...
I suppose you're unable to check the event logs... |
|
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 56789 10> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |