![]() |
Process Explorer v11.12 on Windows 9x/Me |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
| Author | |
gg41
Newbie
Joined: 09 April 2008 Location: France Online Status: Offline Posts: 5 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Process Explorer v11.12 on Windows 9x/MePosted: 09 April 2008 at 5:34am |
|
Hello,
This latest version(11.12)does not work on Windows9x/Me. It has something happens to be done to make this work? Perhaps you put a link with version 11.11 Thank you in advance for your answers. Sincerely |
|
![]() |
|
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17492 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 April 2008 at 5:40am |
|
Hi gg41,
Can you explain what you mean by "doesn't work"?
Hm, perhaps this is related to Christophe's report in Process Explorer on Windows NT. Don't have a 98 / ME box or an NT box to test it with... Edited by molotov - 09 April 2008 at 6:12am |
|
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
|
![]() |
|
gg41
Newbie
Joined: 09 April 2008 Location: France Online Status: Offline Posts: 5 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 April 2008 at 9:04am |
|
When I started the program, here is the error messages I get :
The file C:\PROGRAM FILES\PROCESSEXPLORER\PROCEXP.EXE Requires a newer version of Windows. Upgrade your version of Windows. C:\Program Files\ProcessExplorer\procexp.exe A device attached to the system is not working properly. |
|
![]() |
|
redhawk
Moderator Group
Joined: 14 September 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1222 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 April 2008 at 9:19am |
|
Running Process Explorer v11.12 on Windows 98SE
"The ...\PROCEXP.EXE file expects a newer version of Windows. Upgrade your Windows version." and "A device attached to the system is not functioning." Compatibility for Windows 98SE is broken and Windows 95 still unsupported because of unfixed IDP problem. Richard S. Edited by redhawk - 09 April 2008 at 9:40am |
|
![]() |
|
EP_X0FF
Senior Member
Joined: 08 March 2006 Location: Russian Federation Online Status: Offline Posts: 4753 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 April 2008 at 9:43am |
|
And what you guys expecting? Windows 9x dropped long time ago and newest versions of PE just provides legacy support for this OS's. Now even it is dropped.
|
|
|
Ring0 - the source of inspiration
|
|
![]() |
|
redhawk
Moderator Group
Joined: 14 September 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1222 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 April 2008 at 10:04am |
|
I agree that legacy OS support for 9x is dead but people still run them on old machines or Virtual Machines.
The fact is Sysinternals still advertises Process Explorer with multiplatform support including Windows 9x when it clearly does not. Richard S. Edited by redhawk - 09 April 2008 at 10:06am |
|
![]() |
|
EP_X0FF
Senior Member
Joined: 08 March 2006 Location: Russian Federation Online Status: Offline Posts: 4753 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 April 2008 at 9:29pm |
|
What about tracing new version with Dependency Walker?
|
|
|
Ring0 - the source of inspiration
|
|
![]() |
|
redhawk
Moderator Group
Joined: 14 September 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1222 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 April 2008 at 10:17am |
|
Comparing Process Explorer v11.11 with v11.12 I can't see any difference however using an old program called "Quick View" it appears the newer version specifically requires an OS higher than 9x/NT4 to run.
(Process Explorer 11.12) Operating System Version: 5.00 Image Version: 0.00 Subsystem Version: 5.00 (Process Explorer 11.11) Operating System Version: 4.00 Image Version: 0.00 Subsystem Version: 4.00 It's highly likely that Process Explorer was compiled incorrectly with a restricted OS target. Richard S. |
|
![]() |
|
EP_X0FF
Senior Member
Joined: 08 March 2006 Location: Russian Federation Online Status: Offline Posts: 4753 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 April 2008 at 10:23am |
Maybe this was done specially to drop support? OS/Subsystem version is the reason of failing to start on Windows NT4.0 and Windows 9x. By the way you can try to patch it with PeTools for example, but this will break digital signature. Edited by EP_X0FF - 10 April 2008 at 10:59am |
|
|
Ring0 - the source of inspiration
|
|
![]() |
|
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17492 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 April 2008 at 10:36am |
|
Looks like PE 11.12 (and Procmon 1.30, and Handle 3.31) may be the first version to be built with Visual Studio 2008. I'd speculate that the /SUBSYSTEM linker switch was not adjusted from the default, which would appear to be 5.0 for VS 2008's linker.
Edited by molotov - 10 April 2008 at 10:58am |
|
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |