![]() |
Procmon 2.1 Uses 100% CPU on 2K SP4 |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | ||
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17492 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Procmon 2.1 Uses 100% CPU on 2K SP4Posted: 20 October 2008 at 4:39pm |
|
|
Thanks for reporting that the software that you were using, that seems to have caused issues when used with Procmon.
![]() |
||
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 October 2008 at 4:34pm |
|
|
My problem is a conflict between ZoneAlarm Suite 7.0.483 and
Process Monitor. As soon as I exited ZoneAlarm Suite when logged on to my Administrative account I had no problem running Process Monitor. I never saw the pop-up alerts for Procmon to use Services.exe and SMSS.exe when logged on to my Power User account. I had the same problem intermittently when logged on my Adminstrative account but when I was able to make ZoneAlarm remenber allowing use of Services and SMSS then Process Monitor worked in my Adminisrative account. It did hang the system the 3rd or 4th time I tried it while logged on to my Power User account. I should mention that I do not use ZoneAlarm's AntiVirus but Norton instead as well as loading Norton System Doctor, and TaskInfo a Task Manager like program. |
||
![]() |
||
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17492 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 October 2008 at 4:07pm |
|
I wonder if perhaps ETW is damaged on your system? I've not heard of that happening, and I don't know what to suggest... Are there any entries in the event logs that might seem helpful? So far, no one else has indicated they experienced a similar issue on Win2K. Procmon 2.0 would not run on Win2K, and others discovered this within hours of Procmon 2.0's release. This might suggest that what you experience may not be widespread, or perhaps even specific to your system. Or, maybe others simply need more time to chime in... ![]() Edited by molotov - 18 October 2008 at 4:08pm |
||
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 October 2008 at 3:56pm |
|
|
I let Procmon run with 100% usage for some time probably at least 30 minutes. What would letting it run longer prove? Is there a way to capture what caused it to resume normal activity?
|
||
![]() |
||
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17492 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 October 2008 at 3:01pm |
|
|
It certainly appears that Procmon's driver is busy doing something.
|
||
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 11:24pm |
|
|
The message I mentioned earlier when I stopped Process Monitor capture was not accurate. I suppose you figured out the correct message but to be accurate the message is "Disconnecting from Event Tracking for Windows (ETW) This may take up to a minute.
off to other things. Thanks again |
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 11:06pm |
|
|
Need to do other things right now. Thanks for your response. Will check back later.
|
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 11:03pm |
|
|
here is another stack list
ntoskrnl.exe!KiDispatchInterrupt+0x7b ntoskrnl.exe!KiReleaseSpinLock+0xae4 ntoskrnl.exe!ExFreePoolWithTag+0x16f PROCMON20.SYS+0x1ff8 PROCMON20.SYS+0x2001 PROCMON20.SYS+0x20da ntoskrnl.exe!PsSetCreateThreadNotifyRoutine+0xa8 ntoskrnl.exe!KiDispatchInterrupt+0x422 |
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 11:00pm |
|
|
Don't know if it is an issue but there seems to be two instances of TID for PROCMON20.SYS one at +0x756 with no CPU or CSwitch Delta values and the active one with 90 to 95% CPU usage and 300 plus CSwitch Delta
|
||
![]() |
||
PaulG
Newbie
Joined: 25 May 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 October 2008 at 10:45pm |
|
|
I have no idea if this is an issue but I have VMware Server v2.0 running although there are no VMs running.
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |