![]() |
Windows Internals 4th Ed. Comments&Corrections |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | |
dirbase
Senior Member
Joined: 26 March 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 440 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Windows Internals 4th Ed. Comments&CorrectionsPosted: 13 December 2008 at 11:26am |
|
Added a comment concerning page 278
|
|
![]() |
|
dirbase
Senior Member
Joined: 26 March 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 440 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 December 2008 at 8:19am |
|
I have added some comments for page 167.
|
|
![]() |
|
SBattaglia
Newbie
Joined: 28 August 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 39 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 December 2008 at 4:23pm |
|
Thanks. That answers the question then. I guess I did not read carefully enough. :-)
It would have been nice, but I can live without it... |
|
![]() |
|
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17492 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 December 2008 at 4:13pm |
|
Hi SBattaglia,
From Windows Internals Book:
AFAICR, various chapters of Windows Internals have been made available in PDF form; one is available on the referenced page. |
|
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
|
![]() |
|
SBattaglia
Newbie
Joined: 28 August 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 39 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 December 2008 at 4:02pm |
|
Good morning.
I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to ask, but since this thread is about the book... I've been enjoying that a lot of the Microsoft Press books come with a pdf copy. It makes it easier to read while traveling (or anywhere, since these books are unwieldy), and I like being able to do the exercises without having to balance a book on a small desk next to my computer. Has such a thing ever been available for the 4th edition? I've found no evidence of it so far. I would really appreciate it if there were and I could somehow prove to you that I own the hard copy. Thanks. |
|
![]() |
|
dirbase
Senior Member
Joined: 26 March 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 440 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 December 2008 at 7:52am |
|
A new comment for page 98 (Kernrate experiment).
|
|
![]() |
|
dirbase
Senior Member
Joined: 26 March 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 440 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 10:32am |
|
I have modified my comment for page 579.
|
|
![]() |
|
dirbase
Senior Member
Joined: 26 March 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 440 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2008 at 4:14pm |
|
Dave,
Sounds like the 5th Edition will be an excellent vintage! ![]() Thanks again for your taking into consideration of my comments! |
|
![]() |
|
dsolomon
Newbie
Joined: 01 July 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 19 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2008 at 3:29pm |
|
Fixed already in the 5th edition (and in regard to the previous post, yes we are covering the enhancements to use the TSC to account for thread clock cycles).
And I'm going to report a doc bug on timeBeginPeriod on that bogus statement you pointed out.
|
|
|
--David Solomon
Coauthor, Windows Internals (Microsoft Press) http://www.solsem.com |
|
![]() |
|
dirbase
Senior Member
Joined: 26 March 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 440 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2008 at 8:03am |
|
I have added a new comment on page 344 concerning the kernel variable PsPrioritySeparation which is actually (mis)spelt PsPrioritySeperation in the Kernel!
(it is also referenced on page 351 and 353)To illustrate this: lkd> db pspriorityseparation l1 Couldn't resolve error at 'pspriorityseparation ' lkd> db pspriorityseperation l1 805639c4 02 Edited by dirbase - 04 December 2008 at 10:22am |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |