![]() |
Display bug in "Process Activity Summary" |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
ShawnNa
Newbie
Joined: 20 August 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Display bug in "Process Activity Summary"Posted: 11 March 2010 at 1:10am |
|
Can this bug be confirmed or refuted? Please take a look at my post in Jan. Thanks.
|
|
![]() |
|
ShawnNa
Newbie
Joined: 20 August 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 January 2010 at 8:39pm |
![]() I don't think it matters what version or which OS. Originally saw it on a 32-bit XP. Just reproduced it on a 64-bit XP with procmon v2.8. It's not immediately obvious that it's wrong. This caused me some confusion for quite a while. The way to see this clearly is to run vmmap.exe against an executable and hit Ctrl+E to empty its working set. I did this with the procmon64.exe above and you can clearly see that the graphs are mislabeled.
|
|
![]() |
|
molotov
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 17492 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 November 2009 at 11:47pm |
|
Hi ShawnNa,
I can't say that I'm able to verify what you are reporting. What OS do you note this on, with what version of Process Monitor? Can you perhaps provide more detailed repro steps?
|
|
|
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006 |
|
![]() |
|
ShawnNa
Newbie
Joined: 20 August 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 November 2009 at 8:49pm |
|
This is just a minor bug but it looks like the "Private Bytes" history and "Working Set" history under the "Process Activity Summary" are mislabeled (swapped).
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |