Sysinternals Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Sysinternals Utilities > Regmon
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: IA-64 bit version of regmon
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

IA-64 bit version of regmon
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Share Topic Share Topic  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
molotov View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 October 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17492 		Post Options Post Options   Quote molotov Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: IA-64 bit version of regmon
    Posted: 03 November 2009 at 11:52am
The IA Regmon came along and died before Sysinternals was acquired by Microsoft.  So any EULA / licensing that may apply in that case, would seem to be the one that was "active" at that time (2002? 2005?).  And I'm pretty certain that license agreement would not have permitted distribution in the discussed manner (IIRC, one was to download the utility from Sysinternals, for each system one wished to use the utility on).
<offtopic>
Off topic, but... 
Three years later and still having EULA discussions... LOL
Perhaps author wasn't the correct term, OK.  Still, there has always been some kind of license agreement to use the tools, even in the pre-Microsoft days.  Bryce's comment here seems somewhat related to the discussion, but not necessarily at the level you are getting at.
</offtopic>
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006
Back to Top
scinortum View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 20 April 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 23 		Post Options Post Options   Quote scinortum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 November 2009 at 9:59pm
If that's the case, then yeah, but using a EULA is a very poor way of communicating the author's wishes. Who does that? EULAs are for conveying a corporation's or organization's wishes, not really the programmers'. In many cases, the authors don't even have any legal say in the manner and what they want is irrelevant (believe me, I know). Since no individual would every write crap like some of these modern-day EULAs, it's assumed it has nothing to do with the actual author. Of course, the author(s) has chosen that agreement with the company/organization, but that doesn't mean that they would use a similar EULA/license if they were free to choose what they wanted. A simple read-me that's obviously the author(s) own words works way better than a generic EULA, because that's when respect on a personal level comes in.

Case in point, remember when Sysinternals didn't have all those EULAs? Then Microsoft bought them. That's why there's EULAs. Not because the authors' randomly decided it would be a good idea include compulsory, registry-modifying, obese EULAs that only a faceless multi-billion dollar corporation could love. Playing the human card doesn't work so well.

I don't know who the authors are, but if talking to one, maybe he/she would like to state what they are trying accomplish with the EULA? Maybe there really is some reason for it (other than because the boss said so), but I truly doubt that.
Back to Top
molotov View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 October 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17492 		Post Options Post Options   Quote molotov Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 October 2009 at 11:16am
Saying that it would be wrong to help someone out that really could use this program is just wrong
Please note, that no such thing was said...

Ostensibly, the EULA reflects the wish of the authors, in some capacity.  So it would seem that at least out of respect one may wish to attempt to honor the EULA...
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006
Back to Top
scinortum View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 20 April 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 23 		Post Options Post Options   Quote scinortum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 October 2009 at 1:10am
Everything's a EULA violation nowadays. When the rules (not law, btw) get out of control, people resort to common sense. How is sharing a *free* program (that's no longer offered from "official" sources) bad for anyone? It doesn't hurt the authors, it doesn't hurt Microsoft, there's no loss of profit, etc. It can only be a positive thing. Saying that it would be wrong to help someone out that really could use this program is just wrong. Human nature and ethics overrules.
Back to Top
molotov View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 October 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17492 		Post Options Post Options   Quote molotov Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 July 2009 at 4:26am
Still would wonder if that may constitute an EULA violation...
Daily affirmation:
net helpmsg 4006
Back to Top
hammerli22 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 27 July 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1 		Post Options Post Options   Quote hammerli22 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 July 2009 at 6:07pm
Hello,
 
I am looking for an old regmonia64.exe. Does it exist ?
I know there is a process explorer for IA64 and I know process monitor doesn't work on IA 64,
but I need regmonia64.exe.
 
Believe it or not there is a need for it on IA64 and IA64 is not a dying processor.
 
Anyway if anyone has it please send it to me ,
 
thanks it advance
 
Back to Top
SvenBomwollen View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 29 August 2008
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1400 		Post Options Post Options   Quote SvenBomwollen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 July 2009 at 12:37am
Hello, Saurabh.

To the best of my knowledge, there has never been a Process Minotor version which supported Windows on Itanium.

SvenBomwollen



Edited by SvenBomwollen - 04 July 2009 at 12:37am
Back to Top
Saurabh View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 02 July 2009
Location: Bangalore
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Saurabh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 July 2009 at 5:06pm
Hello zantoro,
 
I understand it's old string however if you email me the same tools, IA64 versions of regmon/filemon/procmon, I would greatly appreciate it.
 
thanks saurabh
cheers
Saurabh
Back to Top
jonny5 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 09 April 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1 		Post Options Post Options   Quote jonny5 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 April 2008 at 8:24am
Hello Roberto,
 
I have been looking for this version for quite sometime (the version that supports ia-64).  Do you still have it?  If so, I'd really like to get a hold of it please.
- Jon
Back to Top
Karlchen View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 June 2005
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5121 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Karlchen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2008 at 2:50am
Hi, Mimino.

Regmon != ProcessExplorer! So this may not be quite the right section to post about P.E. I'd say.

Anyway: item "10. Will it work on 64bit Itanium machines?" inside the Process Explorer FAQs will tell you that starting with P.E. v10.01 the support for IA64 has been re-introduced for Process Explorer. (2006)
The P.E. webpage confirms this is still true for v11.04.

Cannot give any valid statement on plans to (re-)introduce support of IA64 for other Sysinternals programmes, sorry. Cannot give any good advice as to which Windows programmes might feel inclined to run on IA64 at all, sorry. (We only run HP-UX on IA64.)

Karl
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down