![]() |
Bit Defender |
Post Reply
|
Page <123> |
| Author | |
<DNY>
Senior Member
Joined: 19 June 2006 Location: Germany Online Status: Offline Posts: 402 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Bit DefenderPosted: 28 August 2006 at 9:20pm |
|
drweb
what it can find? as far as and bitdefender. try panda.joking,relax guys l ol |
|
|
< DNY >
|
|
![]() |
|
MP_ART
Senior Member
Joined: 08 March 2006 Location: Russian Federation Online Status: Offline Posts: 947 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 August 2006 at 9:25pm |
|
panda is nice animal, but stupid. hihihi
|
|
![]() |
|
<DNY>
Senior Member
Joined: 19 June 2006 Location: Germany Online Status: Offline Posts: 402 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 August 2006 at 9:32pm |
|
more reliable facts? why it is worse than drweb? or bitdefender?
|
|
|
< DNY >
|
|
![]() |
|
EP_X0FF
Senior Member
Joined: 08 March 2006 Location: Russian Federation Online Status: Offline Posts: 4753 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 August 2006 at 9:35pm |
|
Yes, DNY is right, please give us more facts than simple words. Test results for example.
|
|
|
Ring0 - the source of inspiration
|
|
![]() |
|
MP_ART
Senior Member
Joined: 08 March 2006 Location: Russian Federation Online Status: Offline Posts: 947 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 August 2006 at 9:38pm |
|
Panda includes <censored> runtime protection. But the same as other antiviruses in the rest.
|
|
![]() |
|
<DNY>
Senior Member
Joined: 19 June 2006 Location: Germany Online Status: Offline Posts: 402 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 August 2006 at 9:40pm |
|
RKU includes almost the runtime protection,it is not a point to be 'worse'
icee also includes something like this,kav also includes something like this not a point |
|
|
< DNY >
|
|
![]() |
|
MP_ART
Senior Member
Joined: 08 March 2006 Location: Russian Federation Online Status: Offline Posts: 947 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 August 2006 at 9:43pm |
|
This thread about Bit Defender, isn't it? Let's leave animals.
I understand your point, <DNY>Edited by MP_ART - 28 August 2006 at 9:44pm |
|
![]() |
|
EP_X0FF
Senior Member
Joined: 08 March 2006 Location: Russian Federation Online Status: Offline Posts: 4753 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 August 2006 at 9:43pm |
|
Yes, we have some runtime protection and yes it is not a point for product to be 'worse', you are right DNY
|
|
|
Ring0 - the source of inspiration
|
|
![]() |
|
<DNY>
Senior Member
Joined: 19 June 2006 Location: Germany Online Status: Offline Posts: 402 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 August 2006 at 9:46pm |
well ok,but anyway i still doesnt see any deep difference between bitdefender & panda, bitdefender and drweb, all them are useless for rootkit detection and good for old technology stuff. |
|
|
< DNY >
|
|
![]() |
|
<DNY>
Senior Member
Joined: 19 June 2006 Location: Germany Online Status: Offline Posts: 402 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 August 2006 at 9:47pm |
|
bitdefender antirootkit -
![]() l ol |
|
|
< DNY >
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <123> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |