![]() |
Hardware interrupts spiking |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | ||
PepoS
Groupie
Joined: 10 October 2007 Location: Slovakia Online Status: Offline Posts: 40 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Hardware interrupts spikingPosted: 19 February 2008 at 3:48am |
|
On my machine, the global Contxt Switch Delta (Sys Info page) is still still above 100 000 over 10 second refresh intervall (up to 300k, pretty independent of whether the machine is (sort of) idle or 100% busy).
"Interrupts" process alone is constantly causing around 250-300 CSw/s.
The largest CSw consumer is PE alone Edited by PepoS - 19 February 2008 at 3:49am |
||
|
Peter
|
||
![]() |
||
esegura
Newbie
Joined: 18 February 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 February 2008 at 8:34pm |
|
|
Hello folks,
I was wondering what do you consider to be "high" when you talk about Context switches. This of course doesn't include those of you who have their CPUs clogged at 100% utilization. ![]() Using process explorer, I see that my "Interrupts" artificial process is causing a steady 1300 context switches per second. How does this compare to what you guys see on your systems? As reference, while writing this, firefox is my 2nd-highest switcher, context switching at about 700 times per second. Some info about my box: Pentium 4 1.8 Ghz, 1.0 GB ram Primary hard drive is a SCSI fujitsu Two other hard drives, running smoothly on DMA-5 transfers No discs in my dvd or cdrom drives XP SP2 fully patched. Looking forward to see your numbers ![]() Ed. |
||
![]() |
||
sweepdaddy
Newbie
Joined: 17 February 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2008 at 7:17pm |
|
|
thank you everone who contributed to this post, i just reinstalled my ide driver and the comp is back up and running at full speed, having been crippled by 100% cpu. thank god i found this thread before reinstalling everything!! thanks again
|
||
![]() |
||
metasploit
Newbie
Joined: 31 October 2006 Location: China Online Status: Offline Posts: 1 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 October 2006 at 2:14am |
|
|
I will check the above thing for my computer,because my computer's hardware interrupts is always high!
Thanks! |
||
![]() |
||
Buggy Buddha
Senior Member
Joined: 03 March 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 114 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 September 2006 at 4:15pm |
|
Yep, that's one possibility that I always try to be wary of. I have set a ridiculously high maximum size for all the event logs, and since this is a new system, the logs aren't anywhere near full - so the errors having dropped off the log is probably impossible, unless Windows has decided to randomly eat the logs. A full search and manual browse of the logs doesn't show any errors with a cdrom source. It could be that I'm not searching with the right terms, though, or looking for the right thing. They should have Cdrom as the source in any case, right? I can't find anything that has that source in the system log, starting from the date this system was built. You know, I think you might have hit the nail on the head - maybe it was misconfigured to begin with. I haven't used it *that* much. It's odd that I haven't noticed it being slow or anything, though, if it was in PIO mode all the time. Maybe it's still fast enough to not feel slow. Then again, compared to fully formatting a 300 gig HD, which takes over an hour here, pretty much anything feels fast. :D But I will keep a very close eye on it from now on. Process Explorer, and this forum, is priceless for exactly this kind of thing. :) |
||
![]() |
||
namrehto
Senior Member
Joined: 23 June 2005 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 3861 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 September 2006 at 3:34pm |
|
|
One possibility is that CRC/timeout events occurred far enough in the past to have scrolled off the event log. Or the IDE could simply have been misconfigured in the first place. The thing to do now is to watch its behaviour (and the event log) to see if and how the problem recurs.
|
||
|
Gil
|
||
![]() |
||
Buggy Buddha
Senior Member
Joined: 03 March 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 114 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 September 2006 at 3:23pm |
|
Quoting myself, but I've been trying to find the reason the DVD-drive went to PIO. I found this MS article that may be useful to others, as well: http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/storage/IDE-DMA.mspx The most interesting thing I read there is this:
So, any errors that cause Windows to revert to PIO mode should be logged in the system event log. My event log absolutely does not have any such log entries. So are we to assume that Windows did not switch PIO mode on because of errors, but something else happened instead? |
||
![]() |
||
namrehto
Senior Member
Joined: 23 June 2005 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 3861 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 September 2006 at 1:52pm |
|
|
@Icon: Open a new thread in the Troubleshooting forum for your problem. If the interrupts are pretty much constant - i.e. don't only occur during I/O - then one would suspect an issue with sound/video, possibly a driver problem.
|
||
|
Gil
|
||
![]() |
||
Icon
Newbie
Joined: 05 September 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 September 2006 at 12:37pm |
|
|
My Hardware Interrupts are also showing at 50% but I do not think it's the DVD drive.I only have a Samsung CD writer/DVD reader and the IDE controllers are showing 'DMA if available'
Go easy on me as I hope I have understood the above but if I haven't please let me know. |
||
![]() |
||
Buggy Buddha
Senior Member
Joined: 03 March 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 114 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 September 2006 at 8:31am |
|
|
Looks like you were absolutely right. I checked the controller properties, and according to that, the DVD drive is in fact running in PIO mode. Windows even gave a nice warning in that menu, explaining that: "The transfer mode for this device was set to a mode lower than what it is capable of because of excessive transfer errors to that device. This will cause a loss of system performance. Please check the cabling to the device..." Nice. Going to set it back to Ultra DMA 2 mode and reboot. That does leave me to wonder what caused it to revert to PIO mode in the first place, though.
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |