![]() |
phide_ex -untimate process hiding example |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 6> |
| Author | |
Diablo
Senior Member
Joined: 16 July 2008 Location: Western Sahara Online Status: Offline Posts: 251 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: phide_ex -untimate process hiding examplePosted: 01 August 2008 at 6:30am |
Not yet. Future version will incorporate pwalker methods. Csrwalker provides too limited information about hidden stuff, it can't be incorporated in RKU. |
|
![]() |
|
coconut
Senior Member
Joined: 05 January 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 July 2008 at 8:33pm |
|
yes i remember using it well. does current RKU incorporate both pwalker and csrwalker? and thanks for your efforts into these tools
|
|
![]() |
|
Diablo
Senior Member
Joined: 16 July 2008 Location: Western Sahara Online Status: Offline Posts: 251 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 July 2008 at 6:24pm |
|
Yes. It provides much more information about processes it detects. It's quite old program, first release 1st page of this thread.
|
|
![]() |
|
coconut
Senior Member
Joined: 05 January 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 557 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 July 2008 at 6:20pm |
|
does this differ completely in terms of detection from your csrwalker? |
|
![]() |
|
Diablo
Senior Member
Joined: 16 July 2008 Location: Western Sahara Online Status: Offline Posts: 251 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 July 2008 at 5:31pm |
|
I'm rising this apparently dead thread only to notify those who interested that we updated Process Walker to v1.08.
Added full support of the Windows 2000 (mostly related to scheduler lists, and process name obtain method) Added full support of the Windows 2003 all SP's (schedulers list scanning) Added support of the Windows 2008 Added full support of the Windows Vista all SP's (handle table / scheduler lists scanning) Fixed: few possibilities of BSOD while using previous versions. There is nothing 0day in this software, so we decided to publish it for everybody. We tested it with most of available PoC's and it was able to uncover them all
This version contains more stable code, however since this is antirootkit (even if it more looks like PoC), it is always will be small possibility of Blue Screen Of Death etc
MD5 for files in the archive e7e2e11844eb98d004a761d92fb9e31d *pwalker.exe fb49d5793b77c61ab30feb39fc1db7dc *pwalker.sys cb8c51c6c38d33e299d6e308a903c448 *readme.txt D/L |
|
![]() |
|
EP_X0FF
Senior Member
Joined: 08 March 2006 Location: Russian Federation Online Status: Offline Posts: 4753 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 December 2006 at 10:33am |
|
Hi, controler.
Those videos about Rustock behaviour. Rustock no need process to run. It is fully kernel mode rootkit.
Because it is technological demo, that was intended to show how weak in reality all of available currently rootkit detectors. Only GMER/Process Walker/RKU can detect it process. I not mentioned HIPS like SSM because they are not detectors. It is only demo not fully functional rootkit. But it's most impressive demo-rootkit that available now. Not so long time ago I found that DrWeb v4.33 recognized phide_ex as Trojan.Phide. It is nonsense for me. Edited by EP_X0FF - 15 December 2006 at 10:34am |
|
|
Ring0 - the source of inspiration
|
|
![]() |
|
controler
Senior Member
Joined: 01 October 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 222 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 December 2006 at 10:22am |
|
Did I hear the dude in the second video right when he says rustok B has no process to hide but rather the main code runs from the kernel mode driver. If that were the case why would phide_ex use a "hidden process" & driver? Edited by controler - 15 December 2006 at 10:24am |
|
![]() |
|
SpannerITWks
Senior Member
Joined: 14 August 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 896 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 December 2006 at 6:17pm |
|
saso Nice links Thanx ! Spanner |
|
|
Stay Safe - SpannerITWks/SpannerInTheWorks -
BOClean AntiMalware - http://www.nsclean.com/boclean.html |
|
![]() |
|
saso
Groupie
Joined: 10 August 2006 Location: Slovenia Online Status: Offline Posts: 96 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 December 2006 at 10:48am |
|
Symantec about Rustock
blog annoucement general page about handling today's though security threats webcast 1 webcast 2 Edited by saso - 14 December 2006 at 10:53am |
|
![]() |
|
EP_X0FF
Senior Member
Joined: 08 March 2006 Location: Russian Federation Online Status: Offline Posts: 4753 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 December 2006 at 6:39am |
|
Hi, steely.
Good to see you here again. I don't know about wpyung's issue. It could be new malware, or something well known. I don't think that this is Rustock.B. The latest version of RKU is 3.0 RC3. |
|
|
Ring0 - the source of inspiration
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 6> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |